Les structures sociales des organisations internationales : la production de l’équivoque
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dès la seconde moitié du vingtième siècle, l’expansion des organisations internationales(oi) s’accompagne d’appels à en résorber la complexité pour en accroître la lisibilité et l’efficacité. Régulièrement rappelée par les États-membres et les fonctionnaires internationaux, la réduction des doublons et des concurrences intra et inter-organisationnels constituerait une condition indispensable à la revitalisation du multilatéralisme et un objectif consensuel des réformes qui le travaillent. Considérant ces imbrications au-delà de leurs seules dimensions institutionnelles, et en s’appuyant sur trois cas d’études (Groupe d’Action Financière [gafi],ocde, Nations unies), l’article propose un renversement de perspective en saisissant les articulations entre différents espaces sociaux et registres d’action comme un élément structurant de production du multilatéralisme. Loin d’éroder leur pouvoir normatif, ces relations et les arrangements auxquels elles donnent lieu au sein de nombreusesoileur fournissent en retour des ressources importantes pour affirmer leur propre autorité et légitimité.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.031 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.017 | 0.011 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".