Bibliographic record
Abstract
Afin de comprendre la dynamique du groupe des managers de rayon des grandes surfaces alimentaires, cet article propose de comparer l’évolution des conditions de travail et d’emploi sur ses deux principaux segments professionnels et de saisir la relation qui en découle. Ces managers travaillent en effet soit dans une enseigne dite « intégrée », soit dans une enseigne dite « indépendante », structure juridique qui a une influence déterminante sur leurs conditions de travail et d’emploi. C’est particulièrement le cas depuis le tournant des années 2010 où les difficultés économiques croissantes des enseignes intégrées les poussent à réorganiser les rayons et le poste de manager. Chez les indépendants — qui phagocytent les parts de marchés de leurs concurrents —, la situation est tout autre et le poste de manager n’a que peu évolué depuis les années 2000. Ce qui interroge inévitablement sur l’évolution des relations entre les segments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".