La Querelle des femmes au coeur de quatre « Institutions » de l’élite imprimées et largement diffusées en français dans la seconde moitié du XVIe siècle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les partisans et détracteurs des femmes s’affrontant par textes interposés depuis le XVe siècle, leurs arguments se retrouvent dans plusieurs Institutions ou manuels de civilité à l’adresse des hommes et des femmes de l’élite européenne renaissante dont les versions françaises ont connu un large succès d’imprimerie au cours du XVe siècle. L’étude s’attache aux échos et mises en scène des débats sur l’excellence et la dignité des femmes dans les versions françaises les plus diffusées du Courtisan de Castiglione, de l’Institution de la femme chrestienne de Vivès et de L’horloge des princes de Guevara, comme dans l’Institution des princes chrétiens de Boaistuau. La peur du renversement des pouvoirs, les exemples de femmes fortes, les dénégations misogynes et les voix des contestataires qu’on y lit rendent paradoxales les injonctions à la perfection féminine dans un contexte de renforcement de l’ordre du genre et d’explosion des discours contradictoires sur la nature féminine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".