Concussions and Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: Is there a correlation?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background. Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus (NPH) is an adult-onset communicating hydrocephalus characterized by an abnormal accumulation of cerebrospinal fluid. Idiopathic NPH (iNPH) is often underdiagnosed, and clear causes are not identified. Few studies have explored the potential link between iNPH and concussions despite that these entities share many pathophysiological traits. Methods. 56 consecutive iNPH patients were assessed by means of the Ohio State University TBI-ID and Brain Injury Screening Questionnaire designed by the Icahn School of Medicine and were compared to 40 patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) and 40 healthy controls (HC). Results. 76.8% of iNPH patients reported at least one minor head trauma throughout their lifetime when compared to 47.5% and 25.0% of patients diagnosed with PD and HC, respectively. Conclusions. Our findings indicate a possible association between TBI/concussion and iNPH, an association that warrants further investigation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".