Tradition et originalité dans Della Eccellenza e dignità della donna de Galeazzo Flavio Capra
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans cet article, nous présentons l’analyse argumentative de l’oeuvre Della Eccellenza e dignità della donna (1525), l’un des traités les moins étudiés de la Querelle des femmes. Son auteur, instruit à la cour du Duché de Milan, se démarqua parmi les humanistes les plus notables de son temps grâce à son poste de secrétaire de Francesco II Sforza. Galeazzo Flavio Capra rédigea l’oeuvre en prose vernaculaire, réélaborant des modèles classiques et réinterprétant Pétrarque, Boccace, ainsi que d’autres écrivains contemporains. Cette étude vise à montrer l’originalité de cette oeuvre qui sut avancer des arguments qui seront utilisés postérieurement par d’autres auteurs en faveur des femmes. Ces arguments vont défier la tradition et des valeurs littéraires et culturelles de l’époque.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".