MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391838933 · doi:10.33137/rr.v46i3.42709

Dekker, Thomas, John Ford, and William Rowley. The Witch of Edmonton. Ed. Shelby Richard-son

2024· article· en· W4391838933 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
James Mardock

Bibliographic record

VenueRenaissance and Reformation · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicCulinary Culture and Tourism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWitchHistoryArtPerformance artArt historyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This Broadview Anthology of British Literature edition of The Witch of Edmonton (1621)-a collaboration between Thomas Dekker, John Ford, and William Rowley, and others (as the quarto title page's "&c" suggests)-presents an affordable single-volume edition of a fascinating domestic tragicomedy derived from contemporary accounts of the trial of accused witch Elizabeth Sawyer.The play has three tightly interwoven plots: Frank Thorney, an impecunious gentleman, secretly marries Winifred, the pregnant servant of Sir Arthur Clarington, not knowing that Sir Arthur is her unborn child's father, but must also bigamously marry Susan Carter to save his family with her dowry.The abused, poverty stricken, and doomed Elizabeth Sawyer sells her soul to the devil in the form of a talking dog, who later convinces Frank to murder Susan while he attempts to abscond with the cross-dressed Winifred.Meanwhile, the attempts of the clownish Morris dancer Cuddy Banks to enlist Sawyer's witchcraft in his pathetic amorous pursuits are foiled to comic effect.Shelby Richardson's edition provides a fine and generally helpful modernization and, as her introduction suggests, the play deserves the attention of scholars and theatre practitioners for a variety of reasons.As an example of the late, post-imprisonment work of Thomas Dekker, almost certainly the lead author, it offers a diverse snapshot of Jacobean audience interests, featuring the kind of middle-class morality showcased in the likes of The Shoemaker's Holiday (and appropriate for the Red Bull audiences for whom Dekker was accustomed to write) together with a focus on witchcraft aimed to appeal to its actual performance at the court of a king with a keen interest in demonology, and for the more upscale audiences of the Cockpit.The play places sophisticated, and ultimately unanswered, social critique in the mouths of marginalized women-the eponymous witch and her insane victim Ann Ratcliffewith resonances that recall both the trial of Vittoria in The White Devil and the ravings of Lear.That the true villain of the piece is Sir Arthur, a privileged male whose punishment is a negligible fine, while Elizabeth Sawyer suffers arrest and execution, is surely meant by the playwrights to stand as a cruel and illustrative irony.And the character of Tomalin, the colour-shifting, talking, sometimes

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.172
Threshold uncertainty score0.342

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.007
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0550.018

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRenaissance and ReformationSame topicCulinary Culture and TourismFrench-language works237,207