MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391843045 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3953581/v1

A Hierarchical Bayesian Model to Monitor Pelagic Larvae in Response to Environmental Changes

2024· preprint· en· W4391843045 on OpenAlexaff
Alessia Granata, Antonino Abbruzzo, Bernardo Patti, Angela Cuttitta, Marco Torri

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCrustacean biology and ecology
Canadian institutionsImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPelagic zoneBayesian probabilityBayesian hierarchical modelingEnvironmental scienceLarvaOceanographyHierarchical database modelComputer scienceBayesian inferenceFisheryEcologyBiologyArtificial intelligenceData miningGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract European anchovies and round Sardinella play a crucial role, both ecological and commercial in the Mediterranean Sea.In this paper, we investigate the distribution of their larval stages by analyzing a dataset collected over time (1998 - 2016) and spaced along the area of the Strait of Sicily. Environmental factors are also integrated. We employ a hierarchical spatio-temporal Bayesian model and approximate the spatial field by a Gaussian Markov Random Field (GMRF) to reduce the computation effort using the Stochastic Partial Differential Equation (SPDE) method. Furthermore, the Integrated Nested Laplace Approximation (INLA) approximates the posterior distributions of model parameters. The results suggest a strong relationship between sea currents' directions and the distribution of larval European anchovies. For round sardinella, the analysis indicates increased sensitivity to warmer ocean conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.103

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch SquareSame topicCrustacean biology and ecologyFrench-language works237,207