Epigenetic profile of the immune system associated with symptom severity and treatment response in schizophrenia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Environmental modification of genetic information (epigenetics) is often invoked to explain interindividual differences in the phenotype of schizophrenia. In clinical practice, such variability is most prominent in the symptom profile and the treatment response. Epigenetic regulation of immune function is of particular interest, given the therapeutic relevance of this mechanism in schizophrenia. Methods: We analyzed the DNA methylation data of immune-relevant genes in patients with schizophrenia whose disease duration was less than 3 years, with previous lifetime antipsychotic treatment of no more than 2 weeks total. Results: A total of 441 patients met the inclusion criteria. Core symptoms were consistently associated with 206 methylation positions, many of which had previously been implicated in inflammatory responses. Of these, 24 methylation positions were located either in regulatory regions or near the CpG islands of 20 genes, including the SRC gene, which is a key player in glutamatergic signalling. These symptom-associated immune genes were enriched in neuronal development functions, such as neuronal migration and glutamatergic synapse. Compared with using only clinical information (including scores on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale), integrating methylation data into the model significantly improved the predictive ability (as indicated by area under the curve) for response to 8 weeks of antipsychotic treatment. Limitations: We focused on a small number of methylation probes (immune-centred search) and lacked nutritional data and direct brain-based measures. Conclusion: Epigenetic modifications of the immune system are associated with symptom severity at onset and subsequent treatment response in schizophrenia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".