Gold-Deposited Graphene Nanosheets for Self-Cleaning Graphene Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy with Superior Charge-Transfer Contribution
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The interaction of graphene with metals initiates charge-transfer interaction-induced chemical enhancements, which critically depend on the doping effect from deposited metallic configurations. In this paper, we have explored the gold nanoparticle-decorated monolayer graphene nanosheets for the large graphene-induced Raman enhancement of adsorbed analytes, indicating the surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) capabilities of metal-doped graphene (G-SERS). Here, the systematically sputtered Au thickness optimization procedure revealed noticeable modifications in the graphene Raman spectra and photoluminescence (PL) background quenching, which indicated favorable charge transfer through n-type doping of chemical vapor deposition-grown graphene nanosheets. The highly consistent, individually distributed morphology of the gold nanoislands over graphene nanosheets depicted a reproducibly uniform G-SERS signal with excellent relative standard deviation values (<5%), resulting in the strongest Raman intensity enhancement factors of ∼10 8 (MB) (methylene blue) and 10 7 (DPA) (2,6-pyridinedicarboxylic acid) composed of the weakest PL background. The combined charge-transfer-induced chemical enhancement and electromagnetic enhancement from individual Au nanoislands result in a lowering of detectability down to 10 –16 M (MB) and 10 –11 M (DPA) concentrations with efficient time-dependent signal stability. Additionally, the GAu demonstrated its effective (∼94.4%) photocatalytic degradation capabilities by decomposing MB dye molecules from a concentration of 1 μM to 2.52 fM within 60 min. Therefore, the prominent charge-transfer contribution through controlled Au decoration over graphene nanosheets provides a potential strategy for fabricating superior SERS sensors and photocatalysts exhibiting adequate signal consistency, stability, and photodegradation efficiency through overcoming the limitations of the traditional sensing platforms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".