MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391853794 · doi:10.1109/tai.2024.3366174

Multistream Gaze Estimation With Anatomical Eye Region Isolation by Synthetic to Real Transfer Learning

2024· article· en· W4391853794 on OpenAlexafffund
Zunayed Mahmud, Paul Hungler, Ali Etemad

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersInnovation for Defence Excellence and Security
KeywordsGazeIsolation (microbiology)Transfer of learningComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceEstimationComputer visionOptometryEngineeringMedicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose a novel neural pipeline, MSGazeNet, that learns gaze representations by taking advantage of the eye anatomy information through a multistream framework. Our proposed solution comprises two components, first a network for isolating anatomical eye regions, and a second network for multistream gaze estimation. The eye region isolation is performed with a U-Net style network which we train using a synthetic dataset that contains eye region masks for the visible eyeball and the iris region. The synthetic dataset used in this stage is procured using the UnityEyes simulator, and consists of 80,000 eye images. Successive to training, the eye region isolation network is then transferred to the real domain for generating masks for the real-world eye images. In order to successfully make the transfer, we exploit domain randomization in the training process, which allows for the synthetic images to benefit from a larger variance with the help of augmentations that resemble artifacts. The generated eye region masks along with the raw eye images are then used together as a multistream input to our gaze estimation network, which consists of wide residual blocks. The output embeddings from these encoders are fused in the channel dimension before feeding into the gaze regression layers. We evaluate our framework on three gaze estimation datasets and achieve strong performances. Our method surpasses the state-of-the-art by 7.57% and 1.85% on two datasets, and obtains competitive results on the other. We also study the robustness of our method with respect to the noise in the data and demonstrate that our model is less sensitive to noisy data. Lastly, we perform a variety of experiments including ablation studies to evaluate the contribution of different components and design choices in our solution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Artificial IntelligenceSame topicGaze Tracking and Assistive TechnologyFrench-language works237,207