Bibliographic record
Abstract
The eminent sociologist Norbert Elias postulated that no true understanding of human society is possible without a grasp of the "historicity of each individual, the phenomenon of growing up to adulthood."According to Elias, civilizing processes involve a continual redefinition of certain forms of conduct as "child-like" and consequently not appropriate to adults, and, at the same time, a widening sense of childhood as appropriately distinct from adulthood, a realm with its own characteristics and requirements, its own peculiar culture. 1 This is the story that unfolds in Neil Sutherland's Children in English-Canadian Society: Framing the Twentieth-Century Consensus, which we are pleased to offer to a new generation of readers.Looking back over the twenty years that have elapsed since its original publication, Professor Sutherland remarked that, despite ongoing public interest in childhood and family, these subjects "made but fleeting appearances in high school and university courses or in texts in national history" until very recently.His own adult sojourns in the realm of childhood, born of his teacher training and time spent in public school classrooms, led him first to the education faculty at the University of British Columbia, and then to a doctorate in history and education at the University of Minnesota.By his recollection, Minnesota in the 1960s offered "seven or eight social historians . . .which was probably more than in the whole of Canada at the time."It was there that he found inspiration in the seminal analyses of American historians of education Lawrence Cremin and Bernard Bailyn, of Robert Wiebe in his work on progressive reform and "the search for order," and, most notably, of Philippe Aries in his groundbreaking Centuries of Childhood (1962).He became committed to a "child-centred history": a history that would trace shifting cultural perceptions of childhood while making salient the connections between these ideas and the programs that ensued as v vi
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".