MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4391864629 · doi:10.51644/9780889205659-003

Acknowledgments

2006· book-chapter· en· W4391864629 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Stephanie Kirkwood Walker, William Closson James

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicShort Stories in Global Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

M y interest in the lives of artists grew, as I did, in the countryside just outside the tiny village of Blair, on the Grand River in Waterloo County, Ontario.Memory layers scenes and seasons, saturating them with music and art.Most days seem still, configured by the sound of my mother's piano.Yet often enough the atmosphere was convivial, filled with the harmonies of musicians at play; fervent conversations, stretching days far into the night, were swallowed by the hills or by dawn.To maintain a certain decorum, as I recall, religion and politics were avoided topics, but life and art were ready surrogates and argument a common pleasure.John Martin was my champion contender.He and Carl Schaefer taught at the Ontario College of Art in Toronto and, in the summers of my adolescence, came to teach up river at the Doon School of Fine Arts.They both became family friends and through them I caught a glimpse of the larger world of art in Canada.Mostly, though, there were music and musicians.Active throughout the region, many played in the Kitchener-Waterloo Symphony or sang with the Preston Operatic Society; a few jazz musicians moonlighted with the dance band at Leisure Lodge.Others were church soloists (including my grandfather, John Wildman, who had a fine tenor voice) and a few, active on farther, perhaps grander stages, were sojourners.Maria Tippett's description of the place of the arts in English Canadian communities at mid-century, in Making Culture, rings true for me.Making and attending to the arts were critical activities; meaning lay in or beyond or through art.How radically artists who knew modernism conditioned my own views has become clear working through the matters of this book.Emily Carr's words and images, the details of her life and the words of those she in turn has stirred, bring my early world to mind.My principal questions were shaped there.The midnight voice of John Martin remains quintessential, as do his enthusiasms and the sweet agonies of his life-sweet because his art and religion Xlll

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.581
Threshold uncertainty score0.829

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4190.226

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicShort Stories in Global Literature→French-language works237,207→