MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391871315 · doi:10.1142/s0129055x24610063

On the thermodynamic limit of two-time measurement entropy production

2024· review· en· W4391871315 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueReviews in Mathematical Physics · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueAgence Nationale de la RechercheNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMcGill University
KeywordsEntropy productionMathematicsEntropy (arrow of time)Statistical physicsLimit (mathematics)Thermodynamic limitPhysicsThermodynamicsMathematical physicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We provide a justification, via the thermodynamic limit, of the modular formula for entropy production in two-time measurement proposed in [T. Benoist, L. Bruneau, V. Jakšić, A. Panati and C.-A. Pillet, A note on two-times measurement entropy production and modular theory, Lett. Math. Phys. 114:32 (2023), doi:10.1007/s11005-024-01777-0]. We consider the cases of open quantum systems in which all thermal reservoirs are either (discrete) quantum spin systems or free Fermi gases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.434
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it