A250 CYTOKINE MULTI-OMICS AND MACHINE LEARNING IDENTIFY MIP1ALPHA AS A NOVEL MEDIATOR IN INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Macrophage inflammatory protein 1 alpha (MIP1a) is a proinflammatory cytokine previously related to murine models of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), but not definitively in the human disease. MIP1a acts as a chemoattractant of immune cells from the blood to the gut mucosa. We aimed to delineate the alterations to MIP1a and macrophages in relation to a range of IBD severity. Aims To characterize the changes to MIP1a production and localization in response to disease activity in IBD. Methods Both IBD (n=63) and control patients (n=118) were enrolled in this study (HSREB 6033229). Cytokine profiles were investigated using a 17-plex multi-fluorescent bead-based immunoassay (FirePlex, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) on serum from a subset of patients. Disease activity and macrophage levels were extracted from the clinical record. Activity was quantified using the Physician Global Assessment Score. Machine learning (ML) was performed with custom R scripts utilizing the tidymodels package (version 1.1) to determine the optimal model. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was used to localize MIP1a in patient biopsies and quantified using QuPath software (v0.4). Results An extreme gradient boost ML model was found to have optimal sensitivity and specificity for predicting disease activity based on serum cytokine levels. Within this model lower levels of serum MIP1a were associated with higher severity of IBD activity. However, in GI mucosal biopsies, the percentage of MIP1a positive cells in colon tissue increased with the severity of IBD. Macrophage concentrations in the peripheral blood were higher in patients on prednisone, and relatively similar across all other medications used in our cohort. Conclusions With the data collected, we identify MIP1a as a possible prognostic tool for quantifying IBD activity. Funding Agencies CIHR
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".