A65 THE YAP-PER: CAN YAP/TAZ MEDIATE EPITHELIAL-IMMUNE CROSSTALK DURING PYLORIC METAPLASIA?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Gastric cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths and its prevalence has been associated with infection by Helicobacter pylori. H. pylori persistence leads to chronic inflammation, which results in the elimination of acid-secreting parietal cells and the appearance of abnormal mucus-producing cells at the base of the gastric glands, known as spasmolytic polypeptide/trefoil factor 2-expressing metaplasia (SPEM) cells. The processes driving these alterations in epithelial cell fate during H. pylori infection and their function in regeneration of the gastric epithelium remain unclear. Previous work done in our lab have demonstrated that Hippo signalling, more specifically the transcriptional effectors yes-associated protein 1 (YAP) and transcription coactivator with PDZ-binding motif (TAZ), plays an essential role in controlling cell fate during gastric tissue regeneration in a chemical injury model. In the same model, loss of YAP/TAZ resulted in chronic immune cell infiltration in corpus glands, suggesting an immunomodulatory role for YAP and TAZ. Aims The objectives of this project is to characterize the immunomodulatory function of YAP/TAZ in an in vivo model of acute injury as well as an in vivo model of H. pylori infection. Methods Acute injury is induced by high-dose tamoxifen treatment in conditional knock-out (cKO) mice with YAP/TAZ deleted throughout the gastric epithelium. Subsequent immunophenotyping experiments such as flow cytometry and multiplex analysis are performed to characterize the role played by YAP/TAZ in regulating the immune response. For a more biologically relevant model, cKO mice are also infected with H. pylori, and similar immunophenotyping analyses are performed. Results Preliminary results showed that the loss of YAP/TAZ resulted in differential type II response as well as chronic B cell infiltration upon tissue injury. Conclusions This project aims to provide important insights on immune-epithelial cell interactions important for tissue regeneration and tumorigenesis as well as host-pathogen interactions implicated in H. pylori persistence. Funding Agencies CIHRFRQS
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".