A285 COMPARISON OF ADVERSE OUTCOMES IN PATIENTS WITH COMBINED INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE AND PRIMARY SCLEROSING CHOLANGITIS VERSUS ISOLATED PRIMARY SCLEROSING CHOLANGITIS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) results in progressive inflammation and fibrosis of bile ducts causing chronic cholestasis. PSC is associated with an increased risk of malignancy [hepatobiliary and colorectal cancers (CRC)] compared to the general population, in addition to an increased risk of developing end-stage liver disease, often requiring liver transplantation at a relatively young age. The increased risk of adverse outcomes confers an increased risk of premature death of patients with PSC. PSC is commonly associated with IBD, particularly ulcerative colitis (UC), which in itself carries a higher rate of CRC. A study of the impact of PSC with IBD on development of cancer and survival outcomes is imperative. Aims To compare the risk of cancer, liver transplantation, and mortality in PSC-IBD versus isolated PSC. Methods Retrospective data from PSC patients from two hospital sites in Vancouver, British Columbia was analyzed to compare the relative risk of death, transplantation, and malignancy in PSC-IBD versus isolated PSC. Results 169 patients with PSC were included in the analysis [mean age of diagnosis of PSC 37 (SD 16.92) years, 41.4% (70) female]. Out of the 169 patients with PSC, 102 had IBD [29.4% (30) with Crohn’s Disease (CD); 70.6% (72) with UC]. The mean age of IBD diagnosis was 28.96 (SD 14.46) years. Death occurred in 31 [64.5% (20) with IBD; RR 1.19, 95% CI 0.61-2.32, p=0.60] patients, 35 [57.1% (20) with IBD; RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.48-1.59, p=0.66] patients developed cancer, and 33 [66.7% (22) with IBD; RR 1.31, 95% CI 0.68-2.52, p=0.41] patients required liver transplantation. The cause of death was malignancy in 15 [53.3% (8) with IBD] patients, liver failure in 5 [80% (4) with IBD] patients, sepsis in 2 [100% (2) with IBD] patients, and unknown cause of death in 9 [77.7% (7) with IBD] patients. For malignancy types, 16 [68.75% (11) with IBD] patients had cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), 4 [50% (2) with IBD] had CRC, 2 [50% (1) with IBD] had gallbladder cancer, 1 [0% (0) with IBD] had pancreatic cancer, 1 [0% (0) with IBD] had esophageal cancer, and 11 [54.5% (6) with IBD] had other malignancies not involving the hepatobiliary or gastrointestinal system. Of the patients who died due to malignancy, 73.3% (11) had CCA. Conclusions Although we do not observe any statistically significant difference in risk of cancer, transplantation, or all-cause mortality in patients with PSC-IBD when compared to isolated PSC, we do observe that 59% of all-included patients experienced one or more adverse outcome. It is important for clinicians to recognize the high rates of adverse outcomes in PSC-IBD and isolated PSC patients, potentially warranting earlier or more frequent screening for outcomes such as malignancy and liver dysfunction. Funding Agencies None
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".