MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4391873543 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwad061.278

A278 ACCEPTABILITY, FEASIBILITY, AND IMPACT OF THE MYGUT DIGITAL HEALTH PLATFORM IN THE MONITORING AND MANAGEMENT OF INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE

2024· article· en· W4391873543 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jamie Zhen, Martin Simoneau, Prateek Sharma, Pascale Germain, J Marshall, Waqqas Afif, Neeraj Narula

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicMobile Health and mHealth Applications
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityMcGill UniversityUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInflammatory bowel diseaseMedicineDiseaseDigital healthIntensive care medicineInternal medicineHealth carePolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic gastrointestinal disorder that has been associated with depression, anxiety, and decreased quality of life. With new technological advancements, digital health monitoring platforms offer a promising avenue to integrate self-management strategies into the care of patients with IBD. Aims This study aimed to investigate patients’ acceptability to implementing the MyGut IBD health monitoring platform into their care, evaluate whether its use leads to better quality of life/improved health outcomes, and determine the feasibility of its long-term use. Methods We conducted a multi-centre, single-arm trial at McMaster University and McGill University, among their affiliated hospitals, from September 2020 to September 2023. Patients with IBD were recruited in gastroenterology clinics and asked to install the MyGut application onto their mobile devices. Various metrics such as willingness to use the application, patient satisfaction, symptom control/quality of life scores (measured through the short inflammatory bowel disease questionnaire (SIBDQ)), resource utilization, and feasibility statements were collected throughout the study. Patients exhibiting abnormal SIBDQ scores were identified for follow-up. After one year, patient outcome metrics were compared to baseline values. Results Out of the 84 patients initially enrolled, 58 patients (69%) continued until study completion at one-year. At recruitment, all 84 patients (100%) were willing to use the MyGut application after a brief tutorial and 72.6% (61/84) had already been using technology for health-related purposes. There was a significant improvement in SIBDQ scores after one year of MyGut use (median = 57.5, IQR 50.25–62) when compared to baseline (median = 54.5, IQR 47.25–58.75) (p = 0.01). However, only 42.9% of patients (21/49) were willing to continue using the application after one year, a significant decrease compared to the 71.9% (41/57) who were willing to continue after two months (p = 0.002). No differences were observed in patient satisfaction measures (p = 0.42 to 1) or number of ER visits/hospitalizations (p = 0.78) before and after one year of MyGut use. Conclusions Overall, IBD is a condition that often necessitates frequent medical follow-up and may benefit from proactive symptom management strategies. This study demonstrates that patients with IBD are very willing to integrate digital health monitoring platforms into their care and these may subsequently lead to improved symptom control and enhanced quality of life. Future studies should aim to investigate the subset of patients that would benefit most from these health interventions, and as illustrated, continued efforts must be made to optimize the acceptability/feasibility of its long-term use. Funding Agencies CCC

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.343 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicMobile Health and mHealth Applications→French-language works237,207→