MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391873661 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwad061.308

A308 AN UNUSUAL CASE OF MACE DYSFUNCTION: THE BENEFIT OF USING ANTEGRADE CONTRAST FOLLOW THROUGH MIMICKING HOME SETTINGS

2024· article· en· W4391873661 on OpenAlexaff
David Rodríguez, Jacob C. Langer, Michelle Gould

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDigital Imaging in Medicine
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaceContrast (vision)MedicineComputer scienceInternal medicineArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Malone Antegrade Continence Enema (MACE) is indicated in cases where medical management for constipation or faecal incontinence with laxatives or enemas has failed. MACE allows the administration of flushes with and without laxatives in an antegrade manner to mechanically empty the colon. Aims The aim of this case report is to illustrate an unusual case of MACE dysfunction and how it was troubleshooted. Methods Case report and review of the literature Results 11-year-old female with neurogenic constipation and faecal incontinence for which MACE was being used. She was referred to clinic for evaluation of new-onset vomiting, abdominal distention, and abdominal pain with MACE flushes. Her flushes consisted of crushed Bisacodyl, glycerin, PEG 3350 and 300 ml of saline solution. Cone enemas were also being used to completely empty her rectum, otherwise evacuation with regular flushes was not occurring, but was causing significant abdominal pain, distention and vomiting. A contrast study was done by flushing water-soluble contrast through the MACE in an antegrade manner, while simultaneously performing a contrast enema, demonstrating good passage of contrast with no findings suggestive of obstruction. She was admitted to hospital to complete imaging studies, bowel clean out and to better understand her MACE dysfunction. Following bowel clean out in hospital, MACE flushes were resumed, causing the same symptoms. Flushes without Bisacodyl were tried in the attempt to avoid possible colonic spasms; however symptoms re-occurred. A second contrast study was performed (figure 1), mimicking home flushes in volume and time of administration, as well as patient’s position (sitting), completed in an antegrade fashion only. The patient developed symptoms 20 minutes after administering the contrast requiring cone enema. By the end of the study, there was poor passage of contrast through the proximal descending colon, suggesting a kink at the juncture between the sigmoid and descending colon. There was no reflux on contrast into the terminal ileum. An x-ray was done around 5 hours after, and contrast was still not seen in the rectum. The patient underwent diagnostic laparoscopy, finding adhesions in the left upper quadrant of the descending and sigmoid colon, causing a Z-configuration hairpin obstruction, and colostomy creation. The patient has been doing well since colostomy creation with no pain. Conclusions MACE dysfunction can be caused by colonic adhesions distal to the MACE site Simultaneous antegrade contrast through MACE and contrast enema may miss bowel obstruction Antegrade contrast study mimicking home settings may be more helpful in situations where bowel obstruction is suspected Funding Agencies None

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.197
Threshold uncertainty score0.975

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicDigital Imaging in MedicineFrench-language works237,207