MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4391873671 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwad061.057

A57 LONG-TERM EXPOSURE TO ANTICANCER TREATMENTS INCREASES AUTOPHAGY IN ESOPHAGEAL SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA

2024· article· en· W4391873671 on OpenAlexaffabout
M Hamilton, J Douchin, Brian T. Gaudette, Véronique Giroux

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEsophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutophagyEsophageal squamous cell carcinomaBasal cellTerm (time)Cancer researchOncologyMedicineCarcinomaInternal medicineChemistryApoptosisBiochemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background The most common type of esophageal cancer, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), has a 5-year survival rate of only 15%. This low survival rate is to some extent attributed to a high relapse rate, which is, in part, linked to the presence of cancer stem cells (CSC). CSC are a subpopulation of tumor cells that show reduced sensitivity to conventional anticancer therapies, increased potency and self-renewal capacities. With that in mind, ESCC cell lines were exposed in a prolonged manner to anticancer treatments (radiotherapy, 5-FU chemotherapy, and combined therapy) in our laboratory. As expected, an increase in the proportion of CSC (CD44highCD24high) was observed by flow cytometry following the treatments. In pursuit of innovative therapeutic approaches, we conducted an in-depth investigation of the proteomic profiles of these cell lines by mass spectrometry (MS), seeking to unveil novel biological mechanisms. Interestingly, many proteins associated with metabolism and autophagy were modulated. Several alterations were observed by a metabolomic approach as well, namely an increase in intracellular lactate concentration. Recently, a novel role for lactate has been described: lactylation, which is a post-translational modification. Lactylome of those cell lines revealed alteration in proteins related to autophagy and those results led to my research project. Aims Investigate the role of lactylation in autophagy of ESCC. Methods Human ESCC cell lines (including the cell lines exposed to anticancer treatments) will be used as cell culture models. Cell and organoid cultures, mass spectrometry, qPCR, WB, and proliferation assay were used. Results MS analysis of proteins related to autophagy (i.e. RAB1B, CK2, SNX6 et GABARAP) suggests differential regulation of autophagy in cell lines exposed to prolonged treatments. A strong contribution of the 5-FU treatment to the autophagic modification is observable in the double-treated cells. Thus, we confirmed an increase in the LC3BII/I ratio by WB in the cell lines exposed to anticancer treatments. LC3BII/I WB used in combination with Bafilomycin A1 treatment for inhibition of autophagosome and lysosome fusion is a commonly used read-out for autophagic flux. To further study the link between lactylation, autophagy and CSC, we screened 10 human ESCC cell lines for their LC3BII/I ratio. Four cell lines were selected: TE1, TE2, HCE4 and TE5. Using Bafilomycin A1, we confirmed that the autophagic flux in those cell lines was not blocked. Those cell lines will now be used to perform lactylome analysis of sorted CSC cells. Conclusions In brief, our results showed that the autophagic flux is increased in cells exposed to prolonged treatments. This suggests that autophagy could play a role in ESCC response to treatment. Funding Agencies CIHRTRIANGLE, Chaires de recherche du Canada, CRCHUS, Université de Sherbrooke

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicEsophageal Cancer Research and Treatment→French-language works237,207→