MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4391873677 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwad061.261

A261 INVESTIGATING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN AIR POLLUTION AND BIOMARKERS OF CROHN’S DISEASE IN CANADA

2024· article· en· W4391873677 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Jun‐Hua Shao, Meilan Xue, Anna Neustaeter, S Lee, Haim Leibovitzh, Eric I. Benchimol, Williams Turpin, Ken Croitoru

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research InstituteUniversity of Toronto
FundersCrohn's and Colitis CanadaLeona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust
KeywordsCrohn's diseaseDiseasePollutionEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental healthMedicineInternal medicineBiologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background The cause of Crohn's disease (CD) remains unclear. Studies suggest a potential connection between CD and air pollution, with a higher occurrence of CD found in areas with higher pollution levels. Aims Our study sought to explore this potential connection by investigating the relationship between components of air pollution and biomarkers indicative of CD risk. Methods In total, 2,256 healthy first-degree relatives of patients with CD were recruited as part of the CCC-GEM Project. We assessed baseline samples of gut permeability using the urinary fractional excretion ratio of lactulose-to-mannitol (LMR), subclinical inflammation via fecal calprotectin (FCP), and stool microbiome using 16S-rRNA sequencing. Air pollutant (n=8) concentrations were obtained from the National Air Pollution Surveillance Database. We used postal code to estimate air pollutant exposure via inverse distance weighting, averaging data for one (pollutant1-month), three (pollutant3-months), and twelve months (pollutant12-months) prior to recruitment. We used generalized estimating equation models to find associations between pollutant exposure and LMR, FCP, and microbiome composition, adjusting for age, sex, air pollutant seasonality, familial income, and familial relationships. Significance was set at pampersand:003C0.05, and false discovery rate (q) correction was applied to microbiome analysis. Results We observed a negative association between particulate matter (PMµg/m3), PM101-month, and PM103-months and LMR (β=-0.06[-0.09, -0.01], p=6.0×10-3 and β=-0.05[-0.07, -0.01], p=7.6×10-4), and a positive association between PM103-months and FCP (β=0.05[0.001, 0.10], p=0.04). 12-month pollutant exposure was associated with seven microbial taxa in a logit model. Notably, Carbon monoxide (CO)12-months was associated with Oscillospiraceae UCG_003 (β=3.49[1.53, 5.46], q=0.03). PM2512-months was associated with Marvinbryantia (β=0.12[0.06, 0.18], q=0.02). PM1012-months was associated with Moryella (β=0.07[0.03, 0.10], q=0.02). Nitrogen dioxide (NO)12-months was associated with Coprobacter and Ruminococcaceae UBA1819 (β=0.05[0.02, 0.07], q=0.03 and β=0.05[0.02, 0.08], q=0.04). NOX12-months was also associated with Ruminococcaceae_UBA1819 as well as Intestinimonas (β=0.03[0.01, 0.04], q=0.04 and β=0.03[0.01, 0.04], q=0.02). Conclusions Air pollutant exposure was associated with biomarkers of gut inflammation, barrier function, and microbiome composition. A shorter exposure (1/3 months) primarily affected FCP and LMR, while longer-term exposure (12 months) exerted a discernible impact on the microbiome. These findings suggest that exposure to air pollution may modulate the gut barrier function, inflammation, and the gut microbiome, biomarkers that are associated with the development of CD. Funding Agencies Crohn’s and Colitis Canada Genetics Environment Microbial (CCC-GEM) III, Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust, Dr. Croitoru is the recipient of the Canada Research Chair in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.143

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicInflammatory Bowel Disease→French-language works237,207→