MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391873735 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwad061.267

A267 RECENT IMMIGRANTS WITH INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE HAVE SIGNIFICANT HEALTH-CARE UTILIZATION FROM PRECONCEPTION TO POSTPARTUM: A POPULATION-BASED COHORT STUDY

2024· article· en· W4391873735 on OpenAlexafffund
Parul Tandon, Vivian Huang, Denice S. Feig, Refik Saskin, Cynthia Maxwell, Deshayne B. Fell, Cynthia H. Seow, John W. Snelgrove, Geoffrey C. Nguyen

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy and Medication Impact
Canadian institutionsSunnybrook Health Science CentreSinai Health SystemUniversity of CalgaryChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioHealth Sciences CentreUniversity Health Network
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMedicineInflammatory bowel diseaseImmigrationCohortCohort studyDiseaseHealth careObstetricsInternal medicinePolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Previous studies have demonstrated an increase in health-care utilization, such as hospitalizations and emergency department (ED) visits, in immigrant people with IBD compared to non-immigrants. This may be even higher from preconception to postpartum due to heightened provider and patient concerns, though this remains to be confirmed. Aims To characterize differences in health-care utilization from preconception to postpartum amongst immigrant and non-immigrant women with IBD. Methods We accessed administrative databases to identify women (age 18-55) with IBD with a singleton pregnancy between 2003-2018. Immigration status was defined as recent (ampersand:003C 5 years of date of conception), remote (ampersand:003E5 years since date of conception), and none. Differences in ambulatory, ED, hospitalization and endoscopic visits during 12-months preconception, pregnancy and 12-months postpartum were characterized. World region of immigration origin was also ascertained. Adequate prenatal care was defined by using the validated R-GINDEX which assesses the date of first prenatal visit and total number of prenatal visits. Multivariable negative binomial regression was used to report adjusted incidence rate ratios (aIRR) and modified Poisson regression with quasi-likelihood models and robust error variance procedures were used to report adjusted relative risks (aRR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Results 8880 pregnancies were included, 8304 in non-immigrants, 96 in recent immigrants, 480 in remote immigrants. Compared to non-immigrants, recent immigrants had the highest rates of IBD-specific ambulatory visits during preconception (aIRR 3.06, 95% CI, 1.93-4.85), pregnancy (aIRR 2.15, 95% CI, 1.35-3.42), and postpartum (aIRR 2.21, 1.37-3.57) and the greatest rates of endoscopy visits during preconception (aIRR 2.69, 95% CI, 1.64-4.41) and postpartum (aIRR 2.01, 95% CI, 1.09-3.70). There were no differences in ED and hospitalization visits between groups. Compared to non-immigrants, immigrant women were much less likely to have a first trimester prenatal visit (remote: aRR 0.78, 95% CI, 0.65-0.93; recent: aRR 0.61, 95% CI, 0.42-0.88) or receive adequate prenatal care (remote: aRR 0.67, 95% CI, 0.46-0.98; recent: aRR 0.46, 95% CI, 0.22-0.96). Those immigrating from the Americas, Africa, or the Middle East were the most likely to be hospitalized during pregnancy, have a postpartum endoscopy visit, and receive inadequate prenatal care. Conclusions There remain significant disparities in health-care utilization amongst immigrant women with IBD from preconception to postpartum. Health policy endeavors are required to provide standardized and equitable care to all women with IBD during these otherwise high risk periods. Funding Agencies CCC, CIHR

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.049

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicPregnancy and Medication ImpactFrench-language works237,207