MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391876604 · doi:10.1162/imag_a_00101

Systematic cross-sectional age-associations in global fMRI signal topography

2024· article· en· W4391876604 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueImaging Neuroscience · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies
Canadian institutionsMontreal Neurological Institute and HospitalMcGill UniversityMila - Quebec Artificial Intelligence Institute
FundersNational Institute on Drug AbuseNational Institute of Mental HealthNational Medical Research CouncilMedical Research CouncilTemasek Foundation
KeywordsCross-sectional studySIGNAL (programming language)PsychologyGeographyNeuroscienceMedicineComputer sciencePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The global signal (GS) in resting-state functional MRI (fMRI), known to contain artifacts and non-neuronal physiological signals, also contains important neural information related to individual state and trait characteristics. Here, we show distinct linear and curvilinear relationships between GS topography and age in a cross-sectional sample of individuals (6-85 years old) representing a significant portion of the lifespan. Subcortical brain regions such as the thalamus and putamen show linear associations with the GS across age. The thalamus has stronger contributions to the GS in older-age individuals compared with younger-aged individuals, while the putamen has stronger contributions in younger individuals compared with older individuals. The subcortical nucleus basalis of Meynert shows a u-shaped pattern similar to cortical regions within the lateral frontoparietal network and dorsal attention network, where contributions of the GS are stronger at early and old age, and weaker in middle age. This differentiation between subcortical and cortical brain activity across age supports a dual-layer model of GS composition, where subcortical aspects of the GS are differentiated from cortical aspects of the GS. We find that these subcortical-cortical contributions to the GS depend strongly on age across the lifespan of human development. Our findings demonstrate how neurobiological information within the GS differs across development and highlight the need to carefully consider whether or not to remove this signal when investigating age-related functional differences in the brain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.166
Threshold uncertainty score0.992

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it