Systematic cross-sectional age-associations in global fMRI signal topography
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The global signal (GS) in resting-state functional MRI (fMRI), known to contain artifacts and non-neuronal physiological signals, also contains important neural information related to individual state and trait characteristics. Here, we show distinct linear and curvilinear relationships between GS topography and age in a cross-sectional sample of individuals (6-85 years old) representing a significant portion of the lifespan. Subcortical brain regions such as the thalamus and putamen show linear associations with the GS across age. The thalamus has stronger contributions to the GS in older-age individuals compared with younger-aged individuals, while the putamen has stronger contributions in younger individuals compared with older individuals. The subcortical nucleus basalis of Meynert shows a u-shaped pattern similar to cortical regions within the lateral frontoparietal network and dorsal attention network, where contributions of the GS are stronger at early and old age, and weaker in middle age. This differentiation between subcortical and cortical brain activity across age supports a dual-layer model of GS composition, where subcortical aspects of the GS are differentiated from cortical aspects of the GS. We find that these subcortical-cortical contributions to the GS depend strongly on age across the lifespan of human development. Our findings demonstrate how neurobiological information within the GS differs across development and highlight the need to carefully consider whether or not to remove this signal when investigating age-related functional differences in the brain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".