MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391877463 · doi:10.17483/2368-6669.1424

Scaffolding Information Literacy Learning for Undergraduate Nursing Students: A Mixed-Method Exploration of Student IL Self-Efficacy

2024· article· en· W4391877463 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hanneke Croxen, Jody Nelson, Lisa McKendrick-Calder, Wenquan Su

Bibliographic record

VenueQuality Advancement in Nursing Education - Avancées en formation infirmière · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLibrary Science and Information Literacy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInformation literacyMathematics educationSelf-efficacyPsychologyMedical educationLiteracyPedagogyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: Information literacy (IL) competency is an essential component of evidence-informed nursing practice. It is integral to introduce and develop core information literacy competencies for evidence-informed practice within undergraduate education programs. Research has shown undergraduate students may experience challenges with information literacy skills. More research to inform teaching methodologies that effectively enhance students’ skills and abilities, as well as their self-efficacy with these skills, is needed. This article describes an innovative teaching strategy, called journal club, which uses scaffolded learning activities in small groups over one semester. Methods: This mixed-methods research study used a non-experimental pre-post survey and was aimed at understanding the impact of the journal club strategy on students’ information literacy self-efficacy. The survey included the Information Literacy Self-Efficacy Scale (Kurbanoglu et al., 2006) and two open-ended questions in the post-survey. Results: A total of 37 participants, out of 42 potential participants, consented and responded to the pre-survey and 28 to the post-survey. Cohort-based descriptive statistics demonstrated a significant increase in overall scoring on the Information Literacy Self-Efficacy Scale from the pre-survey to the post-survey. Additionally, all relevant item measures from the tool showed statistically significant improvement. The open-ended questions were analyzed thematically, which resulted in the themes of recognition of personal growth, IL skill development, the opportunity to practise, time, the impact in the future, and relational engagement and benefits of the group. Conclusion: Overall, the findings of this study provide ample evidence that the journal club teaching strategy has positively enhanced students’ IL self-efficacy and will continue to be utilized in future offerings of the course. This strategy could be replicated in other contexts and content areas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.018
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.020
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.097

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0180.020
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.466
Teacher spread0.428 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQuality Advancement in Nursing Education - Avancées en formation infirmièreSame topicLibrary Science and Information LiteracyFrench-language works237,207