MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391877669 · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-45731-z

Continuous synthesis of high-entropy alloy nanoparticles by in-flight alloying of elemental metals

2024· article· en· W4391877669 on OpenAlexafffund
Keun Su Kim, Martin Couillard, Ziqi Tang, Homin Shin, Daniel Poitras, Changjun Cheng, Olga Naboka, D. E. Jain Ruth, Mark Plunkett, Lixin Chen, Liliana Gaburici, Thomas Lacelle, Michel Nganbe, Yu Zou

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Communications · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHigh Entropy Alloys Studies
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaUniversity of TorontoUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNational Research Council CanadaUniversity of TorontoGovernment of Canada
KeywordsMaterials scienceAlloyNanoparticleFabricationThermal decompositionPhotothermal therapyChemical engineeringPlasmaMetalNanotechnologyMetallurgyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract High-entropy alloy (HEA) nanoparticles (NPs) exhibit unusual combinations of functional properties. However, their scalable synthesis remains a significant challenge requiring extreme fabrication conditions. Metal salts are often employed as precursors because of their low decomposition temperatures, yet contain potential impurities. Here, we propose an ultrafast (< 100 ms), one-step method that enables the continuous synthesis of HEA NPs directly from elemental metal powders via in-flight alloying. A high-temperature plasma jet ( > 5000 K) is employed for rapid heating/cooling (103 − 105 K s−1), and demonstrates the synthesis of CrFeCoNiMo HEA NPs ( ~ 50 nm) at a high rate approaching 35 g h−1 with a conversion efficiency of 42%. Our thermofluid simulation reveals that the properties of HEA NPs can be tailored by the plasma gas which affects the thermal history of NPs. The HEA NPs demonstrate an excellent light absorption of > 96% over a wide spectrum, representing great potential for photothermal conversion of solar energy at large scales. Our work shows that the thermal plasma process developed could provide a promising route towards industrial scale production of HEA NPs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations47
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNature CommunicationsSame topicHigh Entropy Alloys StudiesFrench-language works237,207