MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Smoke Detection Model Based on Adaptive Feature Extraction Network

2023· article· en· W4391877934 on OpenAlex
Huisheng Zhang, Qianen He

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFire Detection and Safety Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Allergy, Asthma and Immunology Foundation
KeywordsComputer scienceFeature extractionSmokeExtraction (chemistry)Feature (linguistics)Artificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)Data miningEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Efficient detection of smoke plays a critical role in preventing and suppressing fires. However, smoke is generally of variable shapes and colors, blurred borders, and irregular textures, which makes smoke detection based on deep learning a challenging task. Aiming at this problem, a smoke detection adaptive deep model named DB-YOLO is proposed. In the model, Spatial attention-based Dynamic Convolution kernel (SDConv) is designed and embedded as a feature extraction block to improve the ability of extracting representative features from images of diverse textures. Besides, an improved Bi-directional Feature Pyramid Network (BiFPN) is integrated as a feature fusion block to fuse multi-scale features. Results show that mAP@0.5 of the DB-YOLO can increase by 6.08% to 14.40% in smoke dataset compared to currently popular object detection models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.958
Threshold uncertainty score0.450

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFire Detection and Safety SystemsFrench-language works237,207