MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391878552 · doi:10.32920/25234627.v1

Non-Linear and Non-Stationary Speech Analysis of Parkinson’s Disease Using Empirical Mode Decomposition

2024· preprint· en· W4391878552 on OpenAlexaff
Alice Rueda

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVoice and Speech Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WinnipegUniversity of ManitobaBrock University
FundersUniversidad de Antioquia
KeywordsSpeech recognitionDiscriminative modelHilbert–Huang transformSet (abstract data type)Parkinson's diseaseDysarthriaComputer sciencePhonationArtificial intelligenceVowelFeature (linguistics)Pattern recognition (psychology)AudiologyDiseaseFilter (signal processing)Medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p>The objective of the thesis is to provide a set of features that represents the physiological manifestation of Parkinson's disease (PD) in voice and machine learning methods to determine PD voice. PD is the only neurological disorder with increasing age-specific prevalence between 1990 and 2015. There is no cure for PD. Early detection can slow down disease progress through treatments. PD voice impairment can occur as early as 7-11 years prior to diagnosis. Parkinsonian dysarthria has a set of well-established hand-crafted features. However, a lot of these features require manual processes by skilled personnel. Furthermore, most PD datasets are too small for deep learning models. </p> <p>This thesis proposes Empirical Mode Decomposition (EMD) to extract non-linear and non-stationary characteristics of PD voice. To assist with automatic feature extraction, a Minimum Spline Enveloping technique was proposed to provide better enveloping on extremely dynamic PD speech. An introduction of PD voice characteristics, analyses of PD voice, and discriminative ability of Intrinsic Mode Functions (IMFs) in downgraded toll-quality voice were provided to establish the basis of the study. A basic set of EMD features was proposed to represent the phonatory characteristic of the sustained vowel produced by PD patients. These features were tested on the large unlabelled mPower corpus using clustering as unsupervised learning. A set of EMD dyadic features was proposed to represent the articulatory features and tested on /pa-ta-ka/ utterance from the PC-GITA database.</p> <p>Segmentation strategies were also compared to see the efficacy of the dyadic features on /pa-ta-ka/ and was found that the standard voice-onset-time and onset-time segmentation does not work well using EMD. Comparing fixed frame size and /pa-ta-ka/ triad segmentations, /pa-ta-ka/ triad outperformed fixed frame size. Using /pa-ta-ka/ utterances, the EMD dyadic feature alone was able to achieve 78% accuracy, which is 8% higher than using a combination of hand-crafted and basic EMD features on sustained /a/ and various diadochokinesia (DDK) utterances. Extension studies on EMD using deep neural networks to approximate the EMD filter-bank to parallelize the sifting process and the possibility of using EMD for motor analysis have been investigated.</p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.770
Threshold uncertainty score0.878

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.416
Teacher spread0.378 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVoice and Speech DisordersFrench-language works237,207