MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391880567 · doi:10.1680/jenes.23.00107

Malachite green adsorption by Oued Sebou sediment: optimization and desirability analysis

2024· article· en· W4391880567 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Lamyae Mardi, Youssef Fahoul, El Mustafa Iboustaten, Zineb Bencheqroun, Mohamed Alaoui El Belghiti, Karim Tanji, Imane El Mrabet, Abdelhak Kherbeche

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Environmental Engineering and Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Quality and Pollution Assessment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMalachite greenSedimentEnvironmental scienceAdsorptionEnvironmental chemistryEcologyBiologyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dye pollution represents an important portion of the pollutants in industrial waste water. Sediment from the Sebou River (Morocco) was utilised in this investigation to adsorb malachite green (MG) in aqueous solution. The optimisation of parameters associated with adsorption was performed by conducting batch adsorption studies and utilising the response surface approach. The adsorption process was accurately described by both the Langmuir isotherm model and the pseudo-second-order kinetic model, and the maximum capacity for adsorption was determined to be 5.98 mg/g. In addition, the adsorption rate was effectively determined by intraparticle diffusion. The thermodynamic parameters determined in the study revealed that the adsorption of MG dye by the sediment was unspontaneous and endothermic in nature. The regeneration of the sediment in three cycles following adsorption was confirmed. The adsorption process of MG dye onto the sediment was found to be driven by two types of interactions – electrostatic and hydrogen (H) bonding. These results indicate that the sediment has the potential to be an effective adsorbent for removing dyestuffs from contaminated industrial effluent. Moreover, the ready availability of the sediment in the area further enhances its suitability for this purpose.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.219
Threshold uncertainty score0.327

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Environmental Engineering and ScienceSame topicWater Quality and Pollution AssessmentFrench-language works237,207