La sécurité et la santé au travail en tant que droits fondamentaux: étude historique comparative de la stratégie du réalisme vigilant de l'OIT
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Résumé L'auteur présente une étude historique comparative de l'action de l'OIT en matière de sécurité et de santé au travail (SST) analysées comme des droits fondamentaux. Durant les vingt années qui ont suivi l'adoption du Pacte international relatif aux droits économiques, sociaux et culturels, l'Organisation a opté pour une approche réaliste et défendu l'idée que la protection de la SST supposait que les conditions économiques nécessaires soient réunies. L'article revisite cette histoire à la lumière de deux éléments: l'émergence d'une nouvelle réalité, faite d'incertitude, et l'ajout de la SST au cadre des principes et droits fondamentaux au travail de l'OIT. Il montre que l'approche du réalisme vigilant pourrait être appliquée aux activités actuelles de l'OIT dans le champ de la SST.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.020 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".