MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391881543 · doi:10.1007/s11042-024-18608-y

Enhancing cervical cancer diagnosis with graph convolution network: AI-powered segmentation, feature analysis, and classification for early detection

2024· article· en· W4391881543 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMultimedia Tools and Applications · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAI in cancer detection
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersCharles Darwin University
KeywordsComputer scienceInterpretabilitySegmentationCervical cancerArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)Feature (linguistics)Convolution (computer science)CervixCancerMedicineArtificial neural network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Cervical cancer is a prevalent disease affecting the cervix cells in women and is one of the leading causes of mortality for women globally. The Pap smear test determines the risk of cervical cancer by detecting abnormal cervix cells. Early detection and diagnosis of this cancer can effectively increase the patient’s survival rate. The advent of artificial intelligence facilitates the development of automated computer-assisted cervical cancer diagnostic systems, which are widely used to enhance cancer screening. This study emphasizes the segmentation and classification of various cervical cancer cell types. An intuitive but effective segmentation technique is used to segment the nucleus and cytoplasm from histopathological cell images. Additionally, handcrafted features include different properties of the cells generated from the distinct cervical cytoplasm and nucleus area. Two feature rankings techniques are conducted to evaluate this study’s significant feature set. Feature analysis identifies the critical pathological properties of cervical cells and then divides them into 30, 40, and 50 sets of diagnostic features. Furthermore, a graph dataset is constructed using the strongest correlated features, prioritizes the relationship between the features, and a robust graph convolution network (GCN) is introduced to efficiently predict the cervical cell types. The proposed model obtains a sublime accuracy of 99.11% for the 40-feature set of the SipakMed dataset. This study outperforms the existing study, performing both segmentation and classification simultaneously, conducting an in-depth feature analysis, attaining maximum accuracy efficiently, and ensuring the interpretability of the proposed model. To validate the model’s outcome, we tested it on the Herlev dataset and highlighted its robustness by attaining an accuracy of 98.18%. The results of this proposed methodology demonstrate the dependability of this study effectively, detecting cervical cancer in its early stages and upholding the significance of the lives of women.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.959
Threshold uncertainty score0.540

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it