MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391883231 · doi:10.29173/af29501

Expériences locales et littérature graphique mondiale

2024· article· fr· W4391883231 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Gyula Maksa

Bibliographic record

VenueALTERNATIVE FRANCOPHONE · 2024
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicComics and Graphic Narratives
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtFrench

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La représentation des dimensions esthétiques et politiques de la ville dans le cas de la bande dessinée en tant que média touche un ensemble de questions, allant de la relation entre la bande dessinée et l’architecture, au thème des villes des médias de la bande dessinée, en passant par la problématique de la géographie de la bande dessinée et de la représentation en situations transculturelles. L’importance de cette dernière est visible dans de nombreux romans graphiques contemporains dans le monde francophone, qui incluent des noms de villes dans leurs titres, et qui entrent pour la plupart, mais pas exclusivement, dans la catégorie de l'autobiographie, de la bande dessinée de reportage et du roman graphique d’expatriation. Cette fois, en plaçant Aya de Yopougon dans le contexte des romans graphiques francophones, nous examinerons comment cette bande dessinée croise les représentations de la localité, de la vie quotidienne et de l’espace urbain modernisé avec les perceptions et les expériences d’une culture médiatique postmoderne en voie de mondialisation – et comment cela profite à la série en termes de participation au canon émergent de la littérature graphique mondiale.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.066

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0090.015
Scholarly communication0.0060.006
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueALTERNATIVE FRANCOPHONESame topicComics and Graphic NarrativesFrench-language works237,207