MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391883589 · doi:10.3390/app14041579

Simultaneous Trajectory and Speed Planning for Autonomous Vehicles Considering Maneuver Variants

2024· article· en· W4391883589 on OpenAlexafffund
Maksym Diachuk, Said M. Easa

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Sciences · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAutonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTrajectoryControl theory (sociology)Sequential quadratic programmingKinematicsTrajectory optimizationMathematicsPosition (finance)AccelerationTangentQuadratic programmingComputer scienceMathematical optimizationOptimal controlGeometryPhysicsClassical mechanicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper presents a technique of motion planning for autonomous vehicles (AV) based on simultaneous trajectory and speed optimization. The method includes representing the trajectory by a finite element (FE), determining trajectory parameters in Frenet coordinates, composing a model of vehicle kinematics, defining optimization criteria and a cost function, forming a set of constraints, and adapting the Gaussian N-point scheme for quadrature numerical integration. The study also defines a set of minimum optimization parameters sufficient for making motion predictions with smooth functions of the trajectory and speed. For this, piecewise functions with three degrees of freedom (DOF) in FE’s nodes are implemented. Therefore, the high differentiability of the trajectory and speed functions is ensured to obtain motion criteria such as linear and angular speeds, acceleration, and jerks used in the cost function and constraints. To form the AV roadway position, the Frenet coordinate system and two variable parameters are used: the reference path length and the lateral displacement perpendicular to reference line’s tangent. The trajectory shape, then, depends only on the final position of the AV’s mass center and the final reference’s curvature. The method uses geometric, kinematic, dynamic, and physical constraints, some of which are related to hard restrictions and some to soft restrictions. The planning technique involves parallel forecasting for several variants of the AV maneuver followed by selecting the one corresponding to a specified criterion. The sequential quadratic programming (SQP) technique is used to find the optimal solution. Graphs of trajectories, speeds, accelerations, jerks, and other parameters are presented based on the simulation results. Finally, the efficiency, rapidity, and prognosis quality are evaluated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.468
Threshold uncertainty score0.514

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied SciencesSame topicAutonomous Vehicle Technology and SafetyFrench-language works237,207