MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391884138 · doi:10.22323/1.438.0100

Multiscale evolution of heavy flavor in the QGP

2024· article· en· W4391884138 on OpenAlexaff
G. Vujanovic, A. Angerami, Ritu Arora, Steffen A. Bass, Shanshan Cao, Yi Chen, R. J. Ehlers, Hannah Elfner, Wenkai Fan, Rainer J. Fries, Charles Gale, Yayun He, Ulrich Heinz, B. Jacak, Peter Martin Jacobs, Sangyong Jeon, Yi Ji, L. Kasper, M. Kordell, Amit Kumar, Joseph Latessa, Yen-Jie Lee, R. C. Lemmon, D. Liyanage, Arthur Lopez, Matt Luzum, Abhijit Majumder, Simon Mak, Andi Mankolli, Christal Martin, Haydar Mehryar, T. Mengel, James Declan Mulligan, C. Nattrass, J. Norman, Jean-François Paquet, Cameron Parker, Joern H. Putschke, G. Roland, Bjoern Schenke, Loren Schwiebert, Arjun Sengupta, Chun Shen, C. Sirimanna, R. A. Soltz, Ismail Soudi, Michael Strickland, Y. Tachibana, Julia Velkovska, Xin-Nian Wang, W. Zhao

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicHigh-Energy Particle Collisions Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsParticle physicsNuclear physicsQuarkRecoilQuark–gluon plasmaFlavorGluonHadron

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Shower development dynamics for a jet traveling through the quark-gluon plasma (QGP) is a multiscale process, where the heavy flavor mass is an important scale. During the high virtuality portion of the jet evolution in the QGP, emission of gluons from a heavy flavor is modified owing to heavy quark mass. Medium-induced radiation of heavy flavor is sensitive to microscopic processes (e.g. diffusion), whose virtuality dependence is phenomenologically explored in this study. In the lower virtuality part of shower evolution, i.e. when the mass is comparable to the virtuality of the parton, scattering and radiation processes of heavy quarks differ from light quarks. The effects of these mechanisms on shower development in heavy flavor tagged showers in the QGP is explored here. Furthermore, this multiscale study examines dynamical pair production of heavy flavor (via virtual gluon splittings) and their subsequent evolution in the QGP, which is not possible otherwise. A realistic event-by-event simulation is performed using the JETSCAPE framework. Energy-momentum exchange with the medium proceeds using a weak coupling recoil approach. Using leading hadron and open heavy flavor observables, differences in heavy versus light quark energy-loss mechanisms are explored, while the importance of heavy flavor pair production is highlighted along with future directions to study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.949
Threshold uncertainty score0.435

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHigh-Energy Particle Collisions ResearchFrench-language works237,207