MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391886364 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwad061.156

A156 INCIDENCE OF MALIGNANT GASTRIC OUTLET OBSTRUCTION IN PATIENTS WITH PANCREATIC CANCER UNDERGOING FOLFIRINOX THERAPY

2024· article· en· W4391886364 on OpenAlexaff
Y Rostamianmoghaddam, Alan Barkun, Abdulrahman Qatomah, Y Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicColorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFOLFIRINOXMedicinePancreatic cancerGastric outlet obstructionIncidence (geometry)Internal medicineCancerGastroenterologyOncologyOxaliplatin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Malignant gastric outlet obstruction is a morbid complication of pancreatic cancer. There is currently a lack of epidemiology data characterizing its incidence and outcomes in patients with unresectable pancreatic head cancer undergoing chemotherapy with leucovorin, fluorouracil, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX). Determining the incidence of MGOO in this context is crucial for developing effective management strategies. Aims We aim to ascertain the incidence of MGOO in patients with pancreatic cancer treated with FOLFIRINOX. Secondary objectives include evaluating the clinical outcomes of MGOO. The primary endpoint was the rate of malignant gastric outlet obstruction, defined as clinical evidence of MGOO confirmed with axial imaging and/or endoscopy. Secondary endpoints included the length of hospitalization for MGOO and the rate of successful endoscopic or surgical management. Methods This was a retrospective, single-center study including patients with pancreatic head cancer treated with FOLFIRINOX between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2022, who did not undergo surgical resection. Patients were excluded if they had pancreatic cancer located in the neck, body, and/or tail of the pancreas, had predominantly cystic cancer, had an oncological resection, had a prophylactic surgical gastrojejunostomy, or had metastatic cancer to the pancreas. Results Overall, 44 patients with pancreatic head cancer (40.90% female, mean age 59.3 ± 8.5 years) were included. There was no statistically significant difference in tumor staging between MGOO and No-MGOO patients: overall, 6.8% borderline, 40.9% metastatic, and 52.3% locally advanced. The incidence of MGOO in patients with pancreatic head cancer was 36.36%. Patients who never developed MGOO experienced significantly shorter unplanned hospitalizations (mean ± SD: 20.8 ± 18.30 days) compared to those with MGOO (mean ± SD: 50.33 ± 41.22 days; p = 0.0175). The mean number of FOLFIRINOX cycles received was 7.2 (±5.43) for patients without MGOO and 8.1 (±5.81) for patients with MGOO (p = 0.6152). Among patients with MGOO (n=12), management strategies included EUS-guided gastrojejunostomy (43.75%), duodenal stent placement (31.25%), and medical management (25%). Conclusions Our contemporary data suggest a high rate of MGOO (36%) in patients with advanced pancreatic head cancer undergoing FOLFIRINOX treatment. The development of MGOO was associated with longer total hospitalization when compared to patients who never developed MGOO. Our study underscores the significant negative impact of MGOO with further research needed to elucidate better management strategies including better endoscopic or surgical prophylactic measures. Funding Agencies CIHR

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicColorectal Cancer Treatments and StudiesFrench-language works237,207