MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4391886398 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwad061.182

A182 EXPLORING THE LINK BETWEEN SPECIFIC MICROBIAL STRAINS AND ANXIETY AND DEPRESSION IN PATIENTS WITH ULCERATIVE COLITIS

2024· article· en· W4391886398 on OpenAlexaff
B A Chiew, Natasha Haskey, A Lewis, Hera Nadeem, Susan Gold, Lloyd M. Taylor, Kathy D. McCoy, Christina Ohland, Kyle A. McGregor, Maitreyi Raman

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsYork UniversityUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUlcerative colitisAnxietyDepression (economics)Link (geometry)Clinical psychologyPsychologyMedicineInternal medicineMicrobiologyPsychiatryBiologyMathematicsDiseaseEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Anxiety and/or depression (A/D) have been identified as significant co-morbidities of ulcerative colitis (UC), and even considered as extraintestinal manifestations, with emerging evidence to support the role for gut microbial dysbiosis in the natural history for both UC and A/D. However, there is a paucity of knowledge regarding the specific attributes of the gut bacteriome in individuals with UC with concomitant A/D. Aims To explore the connection between the gut bacteriome and A/D in a cohort of patients with UC. Methods This cross-sectional study included 29 participants diagnosed with UC either in remission or with mild to severe disease. To test for depression and anxiety, participants completed the Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8) and General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) respectively. Participants provided a stool sample for microbiome analysis and the fecal bacteriome was assessed using metagenomic shotgun sequencing. Results Among the 29 patients, 55% were female (n=16) and 45% were male (n=13), 34.5 % (n=10) had a Partial Mayo Score over 5 indicating moderate-severe disease activity (median 3, IQR 1-6). Mean age was 38.3 years (± 12.2 years). Sixty-nine percent were on 5-ASA, 42.9% on steroids, 31.0% on Anti-TNF, and 20.7% on immunomodulators. Mean FCP was 976.4 μg/g (± 1589.2). Forty-four percent (n=12) screened positive for anxiety with a median GAD-7 score of 5.0 (IQR: 1-8), while 26% screened positive for depression with a median PHQ-8 of 3 (IQR: 3-10). Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCoA) reveals distinct clustering between UC patients with or without A/D (Figure 1). Regarding the microbial analyses, the log fold change of Firmicutes bacterium CAG:424, Holdemanella biformis, Blautia hansenii, Bifidobacterium pullorum, Anaerostipes caccae, and Ruminococcus gnavus exhibited positive associations with both A/D, whereas Roseburia sp. CAG:303, Prevotella copri, and Bacteroides stercoris demonstrated negative associations. Uniquely, Faecalicoccus pleomorphus and Lachnospira pectinoschiza showed negative associations only with the PHQ-8. Conclusions Our research affirms the presence of anxiety and depression in a cohort of UC patients. The severity of A/D measured by the GAD-7 and PHQ-8 were linked to the levels of specific fecal microbes. We introduce several novel species that warrant further examination in UC patients with and without A/D. As this was an exploratory study, the findings need replication in a larger sample size. PCoA results reveal distinct bacterial clustering patterns between individuals with minimal anxiety/depression (absence) versus those with mild/moderate/severe anxiety and depression as measured by GAD-7 and PHQ-8. Funding Agencies None

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicInflammatory Bowel Disease→French-language works237,207→