MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391886441 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwad061.216

A216 MODERATE TO SEVERE ACUTE UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL BLEEDING IN RURAL NORTHERN ONTARIO: AN EPIDEMIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF AETIOLOGIES, GEOGRAPHIC LIMITATIONS, AND OUTCOMES

2024· article· en· W4391886441 on OpenAlexaffabout
Margaret Saunders, Dwayne C. Savage, Petros Zezos

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsThunder Bay Regional Health Sciences CentreNOSM University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEpidemiologyMedicineGastrointestinal bleedingIntensive care medicineUpper gastrointestinal bleedingInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Hospitalizations for upper gastrointestinal bleeds (UGIBs) are resource-demanding as they often require blood transfusion, endoscopy, and intensive care unit admission. Referral centers that provide higher levels of care to remote regions treat illnesses, including UGIB, in much later stages of disease and of higher severity. The Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Center (TBRHSC) is a referral center servicing over 250,000 people over a geographically expansive region of Northern Ontario. Despite known barriers to accessing care, little data is currently available to guide our understanding of UGIB aetiologies, severity, and outcomes among patients living remotely in Canada. Aims This retrospective study aimed to evaluate epidemiological data among patients with UGIB at TBRHSC. Methods Of 441 patients with a discharge diagnosis of gastrointestinal hemorrhage from 2016–2022, inclusion criteria were met for 333. Patients under 18 y or with lower GIB were excluded. Patients were classified as regional if their primary address was outside the District of Thunder Bay. Results Patients were highly comorbid (median CCI = 5) and presented with a median (IQR) GBS of 9 (6) and Clinical Rockall Score of 3 (1). Of those who received inpatient endoscopy (n=248), findings included erosive gastritis (21%), gastric ulcer (14%), esophagitis (12%), duodenal ulcer (8%), AVM (7%), and variceal (6%). No definite lesion was observed in 62 patients (22%). The median (IQR) Complete Rockall Score was 4 (2) with major stigmata of recent hemorrhage found in 20%. There was a high prevalence (19%) of cirrhosis, of which 83% had a history of liver decompensation. In 49% of cirrhotic patients, culprit lesions did not include portal hypertensive gastropathy or variceal bleeding. Regional patients accounted for 14% of the population and travelled an average of 424 km to seek care at TBRHSC. Regional patients were younger and required more ICU admissions (p=0.01). ICU admission primarily due to UGIB was 5.4% and all-cause thirty-day mortality was 3.3%. Oral anti-coagulation use prevalence was 43.2% and was associated with a longer length of stay (pampersand:003C0.0001), higher proportion of all-cause 30-day mortality (pampersand:003C0.005). Forty-eight patients did not receive endoscopy due to bleeding stability, palliation, and preference. Conclusions Patients with UGIB at TBRHSC are a highly multimorbid population with a significantly burden of anticoagulant use, cirrhosis, and variceal bleeding. Comparative analysis with metropolitan centers will expand our understanding for providing UGIB care in Northern Ontario. Funding Agencies NOAMA

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score0.118

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicGastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207