Pipeline condition monitoring towards digital twin system: A case study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Condition monitoring is essential for the industrial pipelines in manufacturing to ensure the consistent delivery of high quality products with efficient cost. Traditional pipeline conditional monitoring is driven by the entity in its physical space, with little connection to its virtual space. With the development of the digital twin, it is possible to implement the seamless convergence of physical and virtual space. To achieve this, the main challenges lie in building the high-fidelity digital twin, and keeping the connection and update between the physical pipeline and the digital twin. In this context, this paper presents a real-world case study of the pipeline condition monitoring towards digital twin system. This system comprises the components including individual physical pipeline, pipeline digital twin, pipeline knowledge library, Bayesian inference, and service station. Various key techniques (including sensing technique, finite element simulation, internet of things, advanced analytics, cloud computing and virtual reality) are integrated into the pipeline digital twin, to achieve its functionalities such as high-fidelity representation, probabilistic simulation, real-time update, health state monitoring, future state prediction and high-quality interaction. The damage detection, localization, quantification, and prediction are integrated as an ensemble considering uncertainty propagation. The developed pipeline digital twin is adopted to predict the reliability of a set of pipes suffered from fatigue cracking damage. Promising results show its potential for real-world application.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".