MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391888408 · doi:10.1111/edt.12930

The International Association of Dental Traumatology (<scp>IADT</scp>) and the Academy for Sports Dentistry (<scp>ASD</scp>) guidelines for the prevention of traumatic dental injuries: Part 9: Role of dental professionals

2024· review· en· W4391888408 on OpenAlexaff
Nitesh Tewari, Anne C. O’Connell, Paul V. Abbott, Stephen C. Mills, Hans Stasiuk, Mark Roettger, Liran Levin

Bibliographic record

VenueDental Traumatology · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicDental Trauma and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTraumatologyDental traumaMedicineDentistryOccupational safety and healthHuman factors and ergonomicsSuicide preventionPoison controlInjury preventionFamily medicineMedical emergencyOrthopedic surgeryPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The information provided to the injured individual and/or the parents/caregivers must be adequate and in a manner that is understandable to them.The advice should be based on trying to avoid complications associated with the specific injury.Trauma in children aged less than 6 years of age has some unique challenges that must be addressed by the dental professionals managing them.The IADT guidelines recognize this and mention that dental professionals who are well-versed in the management of children must be preferred in such situations.These scenarios are often stressful for children, parents/families, and the dental team.Hence, efforts must be made to instill a positive attitude in the injured children and improve their oral health-related quality of life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.027
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.087

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.027
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.004
Bibliometrics0.0050.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0030.004
Research integrity0.0070.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0260.034

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.131
GPT teacher head0.493
Teacher spread0.362 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDental TraumatologySame topicDental Trauma and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207