Integrated Sensing and Communication: A Network Level Perspective
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Given the wide coverage of communication networks and tremendous number of mobile devices, it has been proposed to integrate wireless sensing capabilities into mobile communication networks so that the growing demands for ubiquitous sensing can be satisfied without extensively deploying dedicated sensing devices. In this article, we study integrated sensing and communication (ISAC) functionalities from a network level perspective. Specifically, we thoroughly investigate how to efficiently manage the available communication, sensing, computing, and storage resources in the network so that sensing requirements can be satisfied without compromising communication performance. First, we discuss the benefits of embedding ISAC into wireless networks as well as the interactions between communication, sensing, computing, and storage on the network level. Then, we present a feasible solution to efficiently allocate sensing tasks among base stations such that the impact of introducing extra sensing workloads on communication services is minimized. Finally, we identify potential research directions and discuss the associated challenges. This article offers a new viewing angle on ISAC-related research and can motivate more research interests to explore ISAC operations from the networking perspective.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it