MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391892421 · doi:10.1109/tim.2024.3366575

CAE-MAS: Convolutional Autoencoder Interference Cancellation for Multiperson Activity Sensing With FMCW Microwave Radar

2024· article· en· W4391892421 on OpenAlexaff
Hossein Raeis, Mohammad Kazemi, Shervin Shirmohammadi

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutoencoderRadarContinuous-wave radarInterference (communication)Electronic engineeringMicrowaveComputer scienceSingle antenna interference cancellationEngineeringTelecommunicationsRadar imagingArtificial intelligenceDeep learningDetector

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Human Activity Sensing is a crucial component of health monitoring and smart environment applications. Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave (FMCW) radars can be used for target tracking, but their collected data is usually accompanied by a significant amount of interference, especially in indoor environments hosting multiple human subjects, leading to a decrease in accuracy. In this paper, we propose a method that compensates that interference and can detect individual activities of multiple humans, overcoming existing methods’ limitation of detecting single human activities. To this end, a range-doppler map of the data is extracted with a FWCW radar, and the interference effect of this map is mitigated by a Convolutional Autoencoder (CAE). The CAE network learns to attenuate false positive regions to strengthen the target areas. This is followed by a Gaussian filter and then the targets are revealed by applying derivatives on both dimensions of the map. Evaluation results show that our method reaches activity recognition accuracies of 97.13% and 73.37% in the cases of one and two humans, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.947
Threshold uncertainty score0.577

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and MeasurementSame topicIndoor and Outdoor Localization TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207