L’insertion socioprofessionnelle en milieu scolaire franco-manitobain des personnes immigrantes formées à l’étranger
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L'insertion socioprofessionnelle en milieu scolaire franco-manitobain des personnes immigrantes formées à l'étranger Formation et profession 31(3) 2023 • 1 ésumé Les personnes immigrantes formées à l' étranger qui veulent poursuivre une carrière d' enseignement dans les programmes francophones au Manitoba rencontrent certains défis : obstacles administratifs, sentiment d'isolement, etc. La recherche-action menée auprès de 16 participants en formation initiale ou exerçant la profession avait pour but de mieux comprendre l'accueil et l'accompagnement reçus durant leur processus d'insertion socioprofessionnelle élargi, qui comprend la période de formation initiale et l'arrivée sur le marché du travail.Les résultats révèlent des expériences favorables (accueil chaleureux, disponibilité du personnel) et défavorables (choc culturel, pratiques d' embauche discriminatoires).Les recommandations visent à améliorer les pratiques pédagogiques, d' embauche et d'accompagnement tout en favorisant une meilleure compréhension de la thématique à l' étude par les acteurs du terrain. Mots-clésInsertion socioprofessionnelle, enseignants immigrants formés à l' étranger, minorités visibles, éducation francophone en contexte minoritaire, pénurie d' enseignants.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".