The Results of the Intergenerational Relationship Program and Creation of New Meaning in the Thai Community Context: A Case Study of Ban Na, Nakhon Nayok Province
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The utilization of intergenerational relationship as the foundation for community development aligns with the expectations set forth by Thailand's national policies, particularly within the economic dimension. This research explores the outcomes of fostering intergenerational relationship and investigates the learning outcomes to create fresh significance in the collaborative occupational development of diverse age groups. It involves the experimental implementation of the Intergenerational Relationship Program aimed at redefining the meaning of community development in the Thai context, with a specific focus on youths and elderly demographics within Ban Na, Nakhon Nayok Province, involving a total of 60 participants. To assess the study's outcomes, different methods were employed, such as surveys and interviews, followed by data analysis to expound upon the observed results. The research findings indicate a positive trend in intergenerational relationship, with enhanced communication between youths and the elderly, increased communal engagement, improved mutual attitudes, and a greater display of friendliness towards one another. Regarding learning outcomes, it was found that the collaborative grouping of individuals from two different age brackets led to the development of community-generated products with inherent value. Additionally, the target groups stated that program participation had the potential to increase community livelihoods and income generation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".