Osteology of the two-fingered oviraptorid <i>Oksoko avarsan</i> (Theropoda: Oviraptorosauria)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Oviraptorosaurs are among the most diverse and best-known extinct theropod groups. Their bizarre anatomy and their social and reproductive behaviour are now well understood. Among the oviraptorid subclade, the two-fingered Oksoko avarsan is particularly well-represented. It is known from several exquisite skeletons, preserving not only the entire skeleton, but multiple stages through ontogeny, providing an exemplar for understanding the anatomy of oviraptorids and the changes that their skeletons experienced over their lifetimes. Here I comprehensively describe the osteology of Oksoko avarsan and comment on its ontogenetic variation. Excellent preservation of the specimens provides unparalleled detail into the anatomy of an oviraptorid, providing valuable context for interpreting other oviraptorosaurs. Several changes are observed to occur through ontogeny relating to robustness of the bones and proportions of the skeleton, but there is little evidence suggesting that discrete features like the cranial crest arose late in ontogeny. Instead, early development of the cranial crest in oviraptorids, and its internal connection with the nasal passages and other pneumatic spaces, argue in favour of a role in vocalization, perhaps alongside sexual display. Detailed anatomical and ontogenetic data, like those provided by known specimens of Oksoko avarsan, are necessary to help to underpin ongoing research into the palaeobiology and macroevolution of Oviraptorosauria.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".