Introduction to the Minitrack on Text Mining and Analytics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This virtual minitrack for HICSS-56 recognizes that most global collaboration systems, social media, and information systems of all types, generate enormous amounts of textual data, including system logs, email archives, websites, blog posts, meeting transcripts, speeches, annual reports, published material, and social media posts.While this structured, semistructured, and unstructured textual data is readily available, it presents tremendous challenges to researchers trying to analyze these large bodies of text with traditional methods.Text mining in big data analytics is an increasingly important technique for an interdisciplinary group of scholars, practitioners, government officials, and international organizations.This minitrack explores the tools, techniques, and insights generated from the analysis of text data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.026 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.011 | 0.012 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.016 | 0.019 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.013 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.085 | 0.087 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".