MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391920817 · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-45743-9

Ultrabroadband high-resolution silicon RF-photonic beamformer

2024· article· en· W4391920817 on OpenAlexaff
Pablo Martínez-Carrasco Romero, Tan Huy Ho, David Wessel, J. Capmany

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Communications · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Photonic Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsHuawei Technologies (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBroadbandPhotonicsBandwidth (computing)Computer scienceSilicon photonicsTrue time delayBeamformingElectronic engineeringOpticsTelecommunicationsOptoelectronicsMaterials sciencePhysicsPhased arrayEngineeringAntenna (radio)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Microwave photonics aims to overcome the limitations of radiofrequency devices and systems by leveraging the unique properties of optics in terms of low loss and power consumption, broadband operation, immunity to interference and tunability. This enables versatile functions like beam steering, crucial in emerging applications such as the Internet of Things (IoT) and 5/6G networks. The main problem with current photonic beamforming architectures is that there is a tradeoff between resolution and bandwidth, which has not yet been solved. Here we propose and experimentally demonstrate a novel switched optical delay line beamformer architecture that is capable of achieving the desired maximum resolution (i.e., 2 M pointing angles for M -bit coding) and provides broadband operation simultaneously. The concept is demonstrated by means of a compact (8 × 3 mm 2 ) 8 (5-bit) delay line Silicon Photonic chip implementation capable of addressing 32 pointing angles and offering 20 GHz bandwidth operation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNature CommunicationsSame topicAdvanced Photonic Communication SystemsFrench-language works237,207