Supervised terrestrial to airborne laser scanner model calibration for 3D individual-tree attribute mapping using deep neural networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Capturing subcanopy forest information from airborne laser scanning (ALS) is constrained by signal occlusion. This study demonstrates the potential of close-range terrestrial laser scanner (TLS) scanning to mitigate the constraints of ALS in acquiring stem-level forest attributes. A transformer-based neural network was adapted to classify and segment 3D individual trees from ALS data. A deep neural network combined with a gaussian process layer was proposed to estimate tree diameter-at-breast-height (DBH) from ALS data. The performance of these methods was compared to other benchmarked methods using the same dataset, including a total of seven classifiers, five segmentors, and six attribute regressors. The study was conducted across four ALS sample areas and ten combined TLS/ALS plots, primarily in montane forests. Manual delineation of TLS trees provided a precise validation reference. The proposed methods demonstrated high accuracies, with a mean intersection-over-union (mIoU) of 0.92 for ALS tree classification, 0.70 for tree segmentation, and a RMSE of 4.2 cm or 18.9 % for DBH estimation on average of the ten plots. Tree detection accuracy was strongly associated with the final segmentation accuracy. Factors such as tree height, overlapping, inclination, and neighboring conditions impacted segmentation accuracy. Our segmentation method effectively mitigated accuracy loss for short and occluded trees. Overall, this study presents scalable and cost-effective solutions for TLS calibration of ALS scans over two meso-scale montane valleys. Leveraging deep neural networks enables scaling of stem attributes to landscape scales, thereby linking fine-scale forest inventory with sustainable management of expansive forest resources. Our codes are available at https://github.com/truebelief/artemis_treescaling.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".