MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391925924 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3912968/v1

Demystifying COVID-19 Mortality Causes with Interpretable Data Mining

2024· preprint· en· W4391925924 on OpenAlexaff
Xinyu Qian, Zhihong Zuo, Danni Xu, Shanyun He, Conghao Zhou, Zhanwen Wang, Shucai Xie, Yongmin Zhang, Fan Wu, Feng Lyu, Lina Zhang, Zhaoxin Qian

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMachine Learning in Healthcare
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaShanghai Municipal Health Commission
KeywordsCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)2019-20 coronavirus outbreakData miningComputer scienceData scienceGeographyVirologyMedicineInternal medicineOutbreakInfectious disease (medical specialty)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract While SARS-CoV-2 infection rates are declining, older adults remain vulnerable to severe disease with high mortality. Although there have been some studies on revealing different risk factors affecting the death of COVID-19 patients, such as bilirubin, organ failure, patient age, and underlying disease, they fail to provide a comprehensive analysis to reveal their relationships and interactive effects on the risk of death. Based on the demographic information, inspection indicators, and underlying diseases of 1917 patients (102 were dead) admitted to Xiangya Hospital over a 4-month period, we used the association rule mining method to identify the risk factors leading causes of death among elderly Omicron patients. Firstly, we used the Affinity Propagation clustering to extract key features such as blood parameters, liver function indicators, renal function indicators, coagulation function indicators, and underlying diseases affecting death from the dataset. Then, we applied the Apriori to obtain 7 groups of abnormal feature combinations with significant increments in mortality rate. The results showed a relationship between the number of abnormal feature combinations and mortality rates within different groups. For instance, patients with “C-reactive protein > 8 mg/L”, “neutrophils percentage > 75.0 %”, “lymphocytes percentage < 20 %”, and “albumin < 40 g/L” have a 2x mortality rate than the basic one. If the characteristics of “D-dimer > 0.5 mg/L” and “WBC > 9.5 * 10 9 /L” are continuously included in this foundation, the mortality rate can be increased to 3x or 4x. In addition, we also found that liver and kidney diseases significantly affect patient mortality. Given patients with liver and renal diseases associated with other abnormal features, their mortality rate can be as high as 100 %. These findings can support auxiliary diagnosis and treatment to, facilitate early intervention in patients, thereby reducing patient mortality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0070.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.370
GPT teacher head0.543
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch SquareSame topicMachine Learning in HealthcareFrench-language works237,207