MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391929662 · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3367289

Intelligent O-RAN Beyond 5G: Architecture, Use Cases, Challenges, and Opportunities

2024· article· en· W4391929662 on OpenAlexaff
Simona Marinova, Alberto Leon‐Garcia

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRanComputer scienceArchitectureC-RANData scienceComputer architectureTelecommunicationsComputer networkRadio access networkGeographyBase station

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Open RAN (Radio Access Network) is revolutionizing the telecom space by introducing a framework based on the concepts of virtualization and openness. O-RAN fosters virtualized and disaggregated RAN components connected via open interfaces based on specifications by the O-RAN Alliance. The network is optimized using RAN intelligent controllers (RICs), which can take data-driven, closed-loop actions in a RAN built in a multi-vendor, interoperable environment. The goal of this paper is to provide insights and guidance about the paradigm shift brought by O-RAN in order to create open, softwarized, intelligent and optimized networks. We focus on the intelligence aspects by providing an in-depth view of the near-RT and non-RT RICs specified by the O-RAN Alliance, including the architecture and interfaces. A novel aspect of this paper is that we provide guidelines in terms of the artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML) approaches and frameworks that are useful in the O-RAN context, and consider the applications (xApps and rApps) that can be created to programmatically and autonomously control and optimize the network through the RICs for V2X, Industry 5.0, and other very demanding service types. Additionally, we provide the E2E network slice orchestration architecture, and demonstrate the suitability of O-RAN for the requirements of the service types to be achieved. Finally, we discuss research challenges and opportunities and overview existing experimental research platforms that are used to innovate and drive advances in the O-RAN effort.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.007
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.152
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations74
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207