MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Cybersecurity Vulnerabilities in Phase-Locked Loop (PLL) of DFIG-Based Wind Power Plants

2023· article· en· W4391929906 on OpenAlexafffund
Mostafa Ansari, Mohsen Ghafouri, Amir Ameli

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid Security and Resilience
Canadian institutionsLakehead UniversityConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPhase-locked loopLoop (graph theory)Doubly fed electric machineWind powerLocked-in syndromePower (physics)Phase (matter)Computer scienceElectrical engineeringAC powerEngineeringVoltagePhysicsPhase noise

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The integration of wind energy, particularly Doubly-Fed Induction Generator (DFIG) turbines, into power grids has increased significantly owing to their performance and cost-efficiency. Within the DFIG-based turbines, a critical component is the Phase-Locked Loop (PLL). This study delves into the cybersecurity vulnerabilities associated with PLL systems. Initially, a dynamic model for DFIG turbines—including voltage and current control loops and the PLL—is developed. The PLL model is assumed to work based on the fundamental frequency of the positive sequence of voltage. Then, it has been shown that when a malicious signal with the natural frequency of PLL is injected into the measurements, the estimation of phase angle will start to oscillate. This instability, in turn, leads to disruptions in the stability of the active power injected into the grid which results in DFIG disconnection and highly threatens the grid stability. We further investigate the impacts of the proposed attack under varying parameter configurations, employing the EPRI benchmark within the EMTP-RV software.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.306
Threshold uncertainty score0.529

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSmart Grid Security and ResilienceFrench-language works237,207