MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Nonlinear filtering based on lattice trajectory piecewise linear approximation with application to a wastewater treatment plant

2023· article· en· W4391930090 on OpenAlexaff
Jiaming Wang, Jun Xu, Jinfeng Liu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWater Systems and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Guangdong ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsNonlinear systemTrajectoryPiecewise linear functionLattice (music)PiecewiseApplied mathematicsMathematicsControl theory (sociology)Computer scienceMathematical optimizationMathematical analysisPhysicsArtificial intelligenceAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

State estimation is a vital part of state-feedback controller design. The extended Kalman filter (EKF) approximates the original nonlinear system through successive linearization. The linearization points are selected at each sample instant, which is computational complex and may not reflect the overall trend of the nonlinear system. In this paper, we propose a nonlinear filtering method based on lattice trajectory piecewise linear (LTPWL) approximation, named LTPWL-KF, in which the nonlinear system is approximated by the LTPWL model offline, and the online state estimation is then based on the constructed piecewise linear (PWL) system. The boundedness of the variances of the estimation error is proved. A simulation study on a wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) is performed. The results show that the estimation performance of LTPWL-KF is comparable with that of EKF, and the online computational burden of LTPWL-KF is less.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.049

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWater Systems and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207