Reassuring pregnancy outcomes in women with mild COL4A3-5–related disease (Alport syndrome) and genetic type of disease can aid personalized counseling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Individualized pre-pregnancy counseling and antenatal care for women with chronic kidney disease (CKD) require disease-specific data. Here, we investigated pregnancy outcomes and long-term kidney function in women with COL4A3-5 related disease (Alport Syndrome, (AS)) in a large multicenter cohort. The ALPART-network (mAternaL and fetal PregnAncy outcomes of women with AlpoRT syndrome), an international collaboration of 17 centers, retrospectively investigated COL4A3-5 related disease pregnancies after the 20th week. Outcomes were stratified per inheritance pattern (X-Linked AS (XLAS)), Autosomal Dominant AS (ADAS), or Autosomal Recessive AS (ARAS)). The influence of pregnancy on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)-slope was assessed in 192 pregnancies encompassing 116 women (121 with XLAS, 47 with ADAS, and 12 with ARAS). Median eGFR pre-pregnancy was over 90ml/min/1.73m 2 . Neonatal outcomes were favorable: 100% live births, median gestational age 39.0 weeks and mean birth weight 3135 grams. Gestational hypertension occurred during 23% of pregnancies (reference: ‘general' CKD G1-G2 pregnancies incidence is 4-20%) and preeclampsia in 20%. The mean eGFR declined after pregnancy but remained within normal range (over 90ml/min/1.73m 2 ). Pregnancy did not significantly affect eGFR-slope (pre-pregnancy β=-1.030, post-pregnancy β=-1.349). ARAS-pregnancies demonstrated less favorable outcomes (early preterm birth incidence 3/11 (27%)). ARAS was a significant independent predictor for lower birth weight and shorter duration of pregnancy, next to the classic predictors (pre-pregnancy kidney function, proteinuria, and chronic hypertension) though missing proteinuria values and the small ARAS-sample hindered analysis. This is the largest study to date on AS and pregnancy with reassuring results for mild AS, though inheritance patterns could be considered in counseling next to classic risk factors. Thus, our findings support personalized reproductive care and highlight the importance of investigating kidney disease-specific pregnancy outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".